Uso de Cookies
SLG Digital utiliza cookies propias y de terceros para mejorar la navegabilidad de nuestra página, su acceso y la personalización de nuestros contenidos. Si continúa accediendo a nuestra página, entendemos que nos otorga su consentimiento expreso para su uso. Puede obtener más información sobre las mismas y su configuración en nuestra Política de Cookies.

The Future of Coding in Schools

Mitch Resnick, one of the creators of Scratch, on why he thinks coding should be taught in all schools—it's not the reason you’d expect.

REVISTA DE PRENSA • 18/12/2017

For more than three decades, Mitch Resnick has immersed himself in educational technology and innovative learning models. Now a professor at the MIT Media Lab, and a co-creator of the popular Scratch programming language, Resnick remains a tireless advocate for student-centered education, collaborative learning environments, and the idea that coding is a form of literacy.

His new book, Lifelong Kindergarten: Cultivating Creativity Through Projects, Passion, Peers, and Play, is a look at our current educational moment. “Roughly two-thirds of grade school students will end up doing work that hasn’t been invented yet,” Resnick contends, hinting at the emerging worlds of artificial intelligence, self-driving cars, and “smart” houses. How do we prepare today’s students to meet that challenge?

We talked with Resnick about the importance of coding in our school system, his thoughts on the changing roles of teachers, and new ways to engage students—and assess their work.

EDUTOPIA: You moved from journalism—writing about computers and business—to the field of educational technology and learning in the 1980s. What inspired that move?

MITCH RESNICK: The most important shift for me in thinking about computers and learning was actually the spring of 1982, the West Coast Computer Faire—which is like an early form of Maker Faire—and Seymour Papert was giving a keynote address. When I heard Seymour talk, it gave me new vision of what role computers might play in people’s lives: They weren’t just machines to get a job done—they could enable people to express themselves in new ways, and change the way people thought about themselves and thought about the world. That was very exciting to me.

EDUTOPIA: Are we still struggling with Papert’s early insight—almost astonishing at the time—that the computer isn’t just a processor of information but a platform for constructing human knowledge?

RESNICK: Yes I think so, and it mirrors a struggle in the education system that has nothing to do with technology. Many people think of learning and education as a process of delivering information or delivering instruction. Other people see learning and education as student-centered—learning is about exploring, experimenting, creating. Those are very different visions that predate the computer, but of course the computer can fit into either of those two models. It’s a wonderful device for delivering information, but it can also be a wonderful device for creating, exploring, and experimenting.

EDUTOPIA: There are influential people, like Apple CEO Tim Cook, saying, “What we need to do is get coding into every single public school. It needs to be a requirement in public schools across the board.” Is that right?

RESNICK: If it were up to me, I would introduce it. But I want to be careful because I don’t want to embrace it for the same reason that some people might. The first question I would ask is: “Why should we learn coding at all?” Many people embrace coding in schools as a pathway to jobs as computer programmers and computer scientists, and of course they’re right that those opportunities are expanding rapidly. But that’s not a great reason for everyone to learn how to code.

Very few people grow up to be professional writers, but we teach everyone to write because it’s a way of communicating with others—of organizing your thoughts and expressing your ideas. I think the reasons for learning to code are the same as the reasons for learning to write. When we learn to write, we are learning how to organize, express, and share ideas. And when we learn to code, we are learning how to organize, express, and share ideas in new ways, in a new medium.

EDUTOPIA: What does that look like in the school system? Does coding sit alongside math and reading? Is it integrated in some way?

RESNICK: These days I talk about our approach in terms of these four words that begin with the letter p: projects, passion, peers, and play. So that’s the approach I would take with coding, but also with any other learning: getting students to work on projects, based on their passion, in collaboration with peers, in a playful spirit. And each of those p’s is important. I think work on projects gives you an understanding of the creative process, how to start with just the inkling of an idea and then to build a prototype, share it with people, experiment with it, and continue to modify and improve it.

We know that kids are going to work longer and make deeper connections to the content when they are passionate about the ideas—when they care—and when they’re learning with and being inspired by peers. And I’d want to have kids experience coding in the same way.

EDUTOPIA: You’re describing a high-choice learning environment rooted in student passion and project work. Where’s the teacher in that mix?

RESNICK: The teacher still plays an incredibly important role, but in this approach it’s not so much about delivering instruction. One role the teacher is playing is the role of connector—connecting peers with one another to work together on solving problems. Teachers also act as catalysts by asking provocative questions: “What do you think will happen if...?” or “That surprised me, why do you think that happened?”

They’re consultants, too, and it’s not just about consulting on technical skills, but also about things like how you continue to work on something even when you are frustrated, or suggesting strategies for working with diverse groups of people. Finally, the teacher can be a collaborator, working together with kids on projects—because kids should see teachers as learners too.

EDUTOPIA: It sounds like a more democratic, open system, which seems to imply breaking down a lot of barriers?

RESNICK: I think breaking down barriers is a good way to think about it. When I think about the type of things that I might change in schools—and I know none of it is easy—a lot of it is about breaking down barriers. Break down the barriers between class periods, because 50-minute chunks are too constraining if you want to work on projects. Break down the barriers between disciplines, because meaningful projects almost always cut across disciplines. Break down the barriers between ages and have older kids work with younger kids—both groups benefit. And break down the barriers between inside of school and outside of school—have kids work on projects that are meaningful to their communities and bring people from the communities into the schools to support the teachers.

That’s one way of dealing with the challenge of a single teacher committed to 30 or more kids. It doesn’t have to be that way. Older kids can be helping younger kids, people from the community can be helping.

EDUTOPIA: A fair question—and a common criticism—is: How do you figure out whether kids are learning anything? How do you assess it?

RESNICK: I would take a portfolio-like approach, looking at what kids create. That’s what we do in our Scratch online community. You can see that a kid has created several dozen digital projects, and you can look through their projects and see their progression. For example, you might see the gradual adoption of new strategies—new types of artwork, but also new and improved programming structures.

I acknowledge that it’s difficult to arrive at quantitative measures, but I also think we each don’t necessarily need to. I sometimes make the analogy to the way I’ve been evaluated here at MIT. There are actually no quantitative measures in the process. Basically, they look at my portfolio: They see what I’ve created, they look at the trajectory and the progress over time, and they ask other people’s opinions about it. You’ll sometimes hear, “Well that’s not serious, we need quantitative measures to be serious.” Are they making the claim that MIT is not serious? I understand the criticism that it’s inefficient, but I think those are things we are going to need to deal with.

Again, it’s a big change and I’m not saying it’s easy, but I do think we need to move in that direction.

Autor: Stephen Merrill en Edutopia el 7/12/2017.

Búsqueda por fechas

Un tercio de los puestos de España peligrará en 2030 por la automatización
REVISTA DE PRENSA • 21/02/2018
Los trabajadores españoles pueden estar tranquilos respecto a la amenaza que supone la inteligencia artificial y los robots, pero solo a corto y medio plazo. Porque en 2030, un 34% de los puestos podrían estar en riesgo por el progresivo proceso de automatización, según alerta el estudio Will robots steal our jobs? (¿Robarán los robots nuestros empleos?), elaborado por PwC y que analiza la situación en 27 países. No es la primera vez que un informe habla del peligro que supone la automatización para el mercado laboral tradicional. Hace casi dos años, la OCDE colocaba a España como el tercer país más afectado —tras Alemania y Austria— por la sustitución de empleos por las máquinas. Pero la consultora ofrece ahora un calendario con tres fases y detalla cifras por sectores y sexos.
Consejos antes de estudiar un postgrado: ¿cuándo y sobre qué?
REVISTA DE PRENSA • 02/03/2018
Acabar la carrera no significa terminar de formarse. De hecho, seguir aprendiendo debe ser una constante en la vida de todo profesional cualificado, de lo contrario corre el riesgo de quedarse obsoleto. La XX edición de la Semana de la Educación sirve de marco para la celebración del Salón Internacional del Postgrado y la Formación Continua, que cumple este año su novena edición y ofrecerá a los visitantes entre el 1 y el 3 de marzo la exposición más completa de másteres, doctorados y estudios de postgrado. Pero, ¿cuándo es el mejor momento para ampliar la formación académica y enriquecer así el currículum? Depende del perfil de cada uno. "Si hablamos de un máster de especialización que tienes muy claro, no hay por qué esperar, pero sí es cierto que estar trabajando ya facilita mucho la integración de los conocimientos porque se aprende escuchando pero sobre todo haciendo y explicando.
Mi profe es un robot
REVISTA DE PRENSA • 28/02/2018
No tiene un MBA ni un doctorado por Harvard. Tampoco un grado en Economía. Ni siquiera tiene la mayoría de edad. “Nací en 2014 en Japón”, cuenta. Y aun así, Pepper ha sido este martes el principal orador en el aula que la escuela de negocios Esade ha instalado en 4YFN, el salón de las startups del Mobile World Congress (MWC). Pepper es un robot. Y ante un auditorio casi tan curioso como entregado está a punto de mostrar sus habilidades en el campo la enseñanza, aunque confiesa que está algo nervioso “Es mi primer día delante de los estudiantes”, asegura levantando las risas de los asistentes. Regina, Jean Mark, César y Dafne son los tres estudiantes que se prestan de voluntarios para interactuar con el robot, desarrollado por la japonesa Softbank Robotics. Lo sabe todo de ellos. Le acercan su smartphone y recita su nacionalidad, su currículum e incluso sus intereses. De vez en cuando, se permite soltar una broma y una pequeña carcajada.
Orientando el futuro
REVISTA DE PRENSA • 21/02/2018
La revolución tecnológica ha cambiado el panorama laboral, tanto que junto a las profesiones convencionales, han surgido nuevas, y amenaza con desaparecer otras muchas. Eso hace que el futuro sea incierto. Tampoco ayudan las condiciones y las oportunidades a las que se enfrentan los jóvenes. Por eso tienen que estar preparados e informados para enfocarse de la mejor manera posible a los nuevos horizontes de trabajo. También los docentes deben adaptarse constantemente a los nuevos medios, y los centros escolares y universitarios deben ofrecer lo mejor. Conocer todas las opciones es fundamental para poder elegir, y si hay una manera de ponerse al día en todos los segmentos de la educación, esa es, sin duda, la Semana de la Educación, una convocatoria integral, organizada por la Feria de Madrid, que estructura su contenido en cuatro salones: Aula, Postgrado y Formación Continua, Interdidac y Expolearning.
Lola González: "La educación no acaba al terminar los estudios"
REVISTA DE PRENSA • 02/03/2018
¿Después de 25 ediciones, con qué van a sorprender este año? Aula comenzó hace 26 años y gracias a estar muy pegados a la realidad de las necesidades de la comunidad educativa hemos ido ampliando la oferta hasta hoy, que incluye cinco salones diferentes con orientación personalizada y experiencias para cada etapa educativa. ¿Qué no hay que perderse? Depende de la edad. En Aula una novedad es Planeta Ciencia, un espacio diseñado para acercar esta materia a los jóvenes. En España hay capacidad pero, por creer que es muy difícil o desconocer sus salidas, muchos estudiantes no la contemplan y necesitamos más científicos. Destacaría también el espacio de orientación presencial, personalizada y gratuita para los jóvenes. También este año estrenamos el Congreso Red, en el que el personal docente compartirá buenas prácticas, Open Campus, un espacio con coachs de orientación para el empleo para los jóvenes que acaban de terminar y quieran mejorar su empleabilidad y Schools Day, donde más de 50 colegios públicos y privados exponen sus programas a las familias y con talleres infantiles.